Today, I’ll present the final part of my series of posts previewing the 2006 season. The first three posts are here:
In Part 4, I’ll forecast the pitching and give my prediction for the team win total.
The Tigers had a 4.51 ERA in 2005, good enough for 8th in the league. Kenny Rogers and Todd Jones should make up for the losses of Jason Johnson, Kyle Farnsworth and Ugueth Urbina but they probably won’t be enough to significantly improve the overall pitching. In order for there to be a substantial improvement in their team pitching results this year, I believe they would need dramatic development of their young pitchers. I do expect some improvement by Jeremy Bonderman but I think Justin Verlander and Joel are not quite ready to break out in 2006. It may be a different story in 2007 or 2008. I also am concerned that they don’t have quite enough talent in the bullpen and that may hurt.
In think most of the improvement in 2006 will come from the offense. That could fall apart too if the injuries pile up too much but I’m going to be optimistic and say that they’ll be a little healthier than last year. As for the predicted team win total…again I’ll be optimistic and predict that they will finish .500 for the first time since 1993. Exactly .500. 81 wins. More importantly, I think their future looks brighter than that.
Now for the individual pitcher forecast:
Starters
Kenny Rogers
Year | IP | ERA | HR | BB | SO |
2005 | 195 | 3.46 | 15 | 53 | 87 |
2006 Projected | 186 | 4.25 | 18 | 48 | 81 |
Jeremy Bonderman
Bonderman pitched better than his ERA last year. He had a season ending elbow injury last year which still concerns me a little but he seems to be ok so far this spring. I think he’ll reach 200 innings for the first time and get his ERA down close to 4.00.
Year | IP | ERA | HR | BB | SO |
2005 | 189 | 4.57 | 21 | 57 | 145 |
2006 Projected | 210 | 4.05 | 24 | 64 | 183 |
Nate Robertson
Robertson faded in the second half of 2005 after a good first half for the second straight year. He also had a drop in velocity which could mean an injury or could just be the result of former pitching coach Bob Cluck’s “pitch to contact” philosophy. I’ll assume the latter and look for Robertson to have similar overall numbers this year.
Year | IP | ERA | HR | BB | SO |
2005 | 197 | 4.48 | 28 | 65 | 122 |
2006 Projected | 185 | 4.60 | 25 | 62 | 127 |
Mike Maroth
Maroth will continue to pile up innings and get hit fairly hard in the process. He will also have good enough control to keep his ERA fairly close to league average.
Year | IP | ERA | HR | BB | SO |
2005 | 209 | 4.74 | 30 | 51 | 115 |
2006 Projected | 205 | 4.65 | 29 | 46 | 100 |
Justin Verlander
Year | IP | ERA | HR | BB | SO |
2005 | 11 | 7.15 | 1 | 5 | 7 |
2006 Projected | 165 | 5.05 | 16 | 70 | 140 |
Relievers
Todd Jones
Jones had perhaps his best year last year at the age of 37 but that was an aberration from his other recent years. I think he’ll be back on the roller coaster again this year. He’ll be one of those relievers who gets a lot of saves but also blows a lot of saves and catches more abuse from fans than he should.
Year | IP | ERA | HR | BB | SO |
2005 | 73 | 2.10 | 2 | 14 | 62 |
2006 Projected | 70 | 3.86 | 6 | 31 | 58 |
Fernando Rodney
Rodney will set up Jones and should be OK in that role. He will get the first shot at closing if Jones blows up. I think he’s more suited to setting up though.
Year | IP | ERA | HR | BB | SO |
2005 | 44 | 2.86 | 5 | 17 | 42 |
2006 Projected | 64 | 3.52 | 5 | 29 | 63 |
Jamie Walker
Year | IP | ERA | HR | BB | SO |
2005 | 49 | 3.70 | 5 | 13 | 30 |
2006 Projected | 56 | 3.86 | 6 | 17 | 44 |
Chris Spurling
Spurling quietly pitched 70 innings with pretty good results last year. He should continue to be a capable middle reliever in 2006.
Year | IP | ERA | HR | BB | SO |
2005 | 71 | 3.44 | 8 | 22 | 26 |
2006 Projected | 75 | 4.05 | 9 | 22 | 35 |
Joel Zumaya
Like Verlander, Zumaya will probably have his ups and downs this year. He’ll be a long reliever but may get some spot starts later in the year. The final numbers might not be too pretty but he will be dominant at times and exciting to watch.
Year | IP | ERA | HR | BB | SO |
2005 | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
2006 Projected | 80 | 4.75 | 10 | 41 | 88 |
Roman Colon
Year | IP | ERA | HR | BB | SO |
2005 | 69 | 5.58 | 17 | 21 | 47 |
2006 Projected | 95 | 4.97 | 18 | 38 | 63 |
Bobby Seay
Jim Leyland wants a second left-hander in the bullpen and Bobby Seay could be the man. He pitched OK in brief stints with
Year | IP | ERA | HR | BB | SO |
2005 | 12 | 8.49 | 3 | 8 | 11 |
2006 Projected | 50 | 4.35 | 7 | 24 | 42 |
I agree with starting Colon in the minors and sticking with Grilli for long relief.
ReplyDeleteIn your post you show Verlander having an ERA of 2.05 is this right??? That would be an amazing first year, something to get very excited about. I noticed you didn't put down win totals for the individual pitchers, is this something you could do?
Also...if German does not make the team, and since Pena has already been released shouldn't we start dissecting the Weaver for Bonderman trade? Was it really worth it?
Oops, 2.05 would be some wishful thinking! I meant to write down 5.05 for Verlander. I think he'll be dominant at times and really bad at times. It will be a learning year for him.
ReplyDeleteI didn't include win totals because I consider that to be a team statistic rather than an individual statistic. I'll give it a shot though:
Bonderman 16
Rogers 14
Maroth 12
Robertson 11
Verlander 9
Spot starters 5
bullpen 14
If you look at total win shares since the trade was made, Pena and Bonderman combined are ahead of Weaver. I honestly feel as if they have done more to help the team win than Weaver has done to help his teams win. So looking back, I think the Tigers have won the trade so far.
ReplyDeleteThat's not necessarily the best way to look at it though. The main goal of course, is to get into the playoffs and Pena can't help them do that anymore. Looking ahead, it will come to who does better: Weaver or Bonderman. I still like Bonderman better for the future but only time will tell.
Also, Pena and Bonderman are two players, to Weaver's one. A way of being more fair to Weaver would be considering Pena/Bonderman vs. Weaver/whoever would've played first. That's probably Eric Munson.... I suppose one would have to either translate his minor league numbers or determine what might've been expected had he stayed in Detroit.
ReplyDeleteSurprisingly, Pena has actually accumulated more win shares than Weaver all by himself. Of course, it's harder to find league average innings eating pitchers than first basemen. Still, while Pena has been a disappointment, I think he accomplished more than people give him credit for.
ReplyDelete