I asked fans here and at Motown Sports to give their best guesses at the 2008 statistics of all the starters including the potential platoon in left field. I then aggregated the results to get a community projection for each player. They can be seen below along side five computer projections for each player. The five systems and their inventors are listed below:
- ZIPS – Dan Szymborski at Baseball Think Factory
- CHONE - Chone Smith who blogs at Anaheim Angels all the way
- Marcels - Tom Tango at Tangotiger.net
- The Bill James Handbook Projections (BJHB) – Baseball Info Solutions
- MINER - Jeff Sackmann who writes for Beyond the Box Score
You will see all of them right away except BJHB. Those can be found on the individual player pages under season stats. The Baseball Prospectus PECOTA projections (the most sophisticated of the scientific systems) are not shown because they are premium content. However, they should be available after the season when I compare the results.
Note that the sample size (N) of fan voters ranges from 14 to 39. This is because I asked for projections for two players each week and fan participation varied from week to week. Not surprisingly, the Tigers fans tended to be more optimistic than the computers. A lot of that is likely bias but but I also feel as some of it is justified as some of the computer forecasts seem a bit too negative this year. The MINER system, in particular , paints a surprisingly bleak picture for the Tigers line-up. The most generous of the scientific sytems was the Bill James Handbook system. Player by player fan and computer comparisons along with my comments are shown below.
Curtis Granderson
System | AB | BA | OBP | SLG | OPS | HR | RBI |
Fans (N=23) | 600 | .300 | .364 | .546 | .910 | 25 | 81 |
ZIPS | 608 | .278 | .345 | .475 | .820 | 21 | 87 |
Chone | 575 | .277 | .345 | .475 | .820 | 20 | 75 |
Marcel | 542 | .284 | .349 | .494 | .843 | 19 | 66 |
BJHB | 568 | .294 | .359 | .523 | .882 | 22 | 72 |
MINER | 593 | .268 | .329 | .467 | .796 | 21 | 74 |
The fans are much more optimistic about Granderson than most other systems. The computer pessimism is understandable because Granderson had such a such a big and unexpected improvement last year, struggles mightily against lefties and has trouble making consistent contact. Part of the fan optimism might be his popularity but they also are aware that he has exceeded expectations every step of the way and that he has a propensity to correct his shortcomings. I'm not usually big on intangibles but I'm siding with the fans on this one. The BJHB projection also looks reasonable.
Placido Polanco
System | AB | BA | OBP | SLG | OPS | HR | RBI |
Fans (N=20) | 573 | .321 | .372 | .423 | .795 | 8 | 66 |
ZIPS | 499 | .317 | .407 | .358 | .765 | 7 | 61 |
Chone | 530 | .309 | .360 | .415 | .775 | 8 | 58 |
Marcel | 570 | .313 | .360 | .420 | .780 | 8 | 60 |
BJHB | 574 | .312 | .360 | .423 | .783 | 10 | 62 |
MINER | 506 | .308 | .350 | .393 | .743 | 6 | 50 |
Even the fan community expects a regression for Polanco who batted a career .341 and had an OBP of .388 in 2007 (both career highs). There is not a lot of difference between the fans and most of the systems. I'll go with Marcel and BJHB which have almost identical identical projections.
Gary Sheffield
System | AB | BA | OBP | SLG | OPS | HR | RBI |
Fans (N=16) | 462 | .292 | .391 | .503 | .894 | 26 | 90 |
ZIPS | 320 | .269 | .366 | .438 | .804 | 14 | 65 |
Chone | 406 | .268 | .369 | .456 | .825 | 19 | 66 |
Marcel | 443 | .269 | .361 | .451 | .812 | 20 | 72 |
BJHB | 490 | .280 | .384 | .488 | .872 | 26 | 87 |
MINER | 373 | .260 | .347 | .424 | .771 | 15 | 52 |
System | AB | BA | OBP | SLG | OPS | HR | RBI |
Fans (N=33) | 566 | .318 | .393 | .549 | .942 | 27 | 124 |
ZIPS | 476 | .309 | .366 | .481 | .847 | 17 | 91 |
Chone | 568 | .308 | .378 | .495 | .873 | 23 | 99 |
Marcel | 541 | .316 | .379 | .505 | .884 | 21 | 101 |
BJHB | 580 | .314 | .383 | .517 | .900 | 25 | 111 |
MINER | 530 | .292 | .355 | .447 | .802 | 18 | 85 |
System | AB | BA | OBP | SLG | OPS | HR | RBI |
Fans (N=20) | 583 | .325 | .409 | .573 | .982 | 34 | 129 |
ZIPS | 601 | .318 | .407 | .589 | .996 | 33 | 122 |
Chone | 567 | .317 | .395 | .545 | .940 | 29 | 109 |
Marcel | 608 | .328 | .409 | .558 | .967 | 26 | 103 |
BJHB | 606 | .327 | .411 | .579 | .990 | 35 | 128 |
MINER | 606 | .320 | .404 | .551 | .955 | 31 | 118 |
There is not a great deal of disagreement between the systems on Cabrera as the OPS ranges from .996 (ZIPS) to .940 (Chone). I see no reason not to go with the most optimistic projection here.
Carlos Guillen
System | AB | BA | OBP | SLG | OPS | HR | RBI |
Fans (N=14) | 526 | .301 | .368 | .495 | .863 | 21 | 94 |
ZIPS | 476 | .296 | .359 | .471 | .830 | 15 | 78 |
Chone | 538 | .294 | .365 | .472 | .837 | 18 | 89 |
Marcel | 516 | .298 | .364 | .472 | .836 | 18 | 89 |
BJHB | 562 | .297 | .368 | .466 | .834 | 17 | 85 |
MINER | 510 | .284 | .350 | .433 | .783 | 14 | 66 |
The fans again paint the rosiest picture for Guillen but most of the systems (except MINER) are reasonably close. Again, I'll go with the high end projection of the fans.
Edgar Renteria
System | AB | BA | OBP | SLG | OPS | HR | RBI |
Fans (N=16) | 551 | .291 | .349 | .420 | .769 | 11 | 68 |
ZIPS | 547 | .287 | .349 | .395 | .744 | 10 | 62 |
Chone | 517 | .282 | .342 | .400 | .742 | 10 | 64 |
Marcel | 485 | .295 | .357 | .425 | .782 | 10 | 57 |
BJHB | 589 | .294 | .357 | .421 | .778 | 12 | 74 |
MINER | 510 | .286 | .349 | .406 | .755 | 10 | 52 |
There is very little variation between the systems on Renteria with OPS ranging from .742 (Chone) to to .782 (Marcel). It doesn't surprise me that the fans are not giving him the most favorable numbers here as the trade (somewhat surprisingly) has not been met especially warmly around the net. I will go with BJHB forecast.
Pudge Rodriguez
System | AB | BA | OBP | SLG | OPS | HR | RBI |
Fans (N=39) | 462 | .284 | .308 | .430 | .738 | 11 | 63 |
ZIPS | 445 | .276 | .296 | .400 | .696 | 8 | 60 |
Chone | 505 | .267 | .295 | .402 | .697 | 12 | 63 |
Marcel | 490 | .278 | .305 | .420 | .725 | 12 | 58 |
BJHB | 489 | .284 | .316 | .431 | .747 | 13 | 62 |
MINER | 294 | .248 | .271 | .350 | .621 | 5 | 28 |
There is quite a bit of disagreement on Rodriguez as OPS ranges from .621 (MINER) to .747 (BJHB). I'll take the fans prediction here.
Jacque Jones
System | AB | BA | OBP | SLG | OPS | HR | RBI |
Fans (N=19) | 396 | .276 | .326 | .441 | .767 | 12 | 55 |
ZIPS | 415 | .267 | .322 | .390 | .712 | 10 | 54 |
Chone | 473 | .260 | .318 | .402 | .720 | 13 | 59 |
Marcel | 459 | .272 | .330 | .438 | .768 | 15 | 66 |
BJHB | 443 | .278 | .332 | .433 | .765 | 14 | 61 |
MINER | 460 | .265 | .323 | .411 | .734 | 13 | 59 |
The community is giving fewer at bats to Jones than any other system. This is probably because they they think (hope?) that he will be platooned. Jim Leyland doesn't seem to be big on platooning but he was a lot of right-handed options so I think we'll see a platoon eventually take shape. The fan projection looks ok to me.
Marcus Thames
System | AB | BA | OBP | SLG | OPS | HR | RBI |
Fans (N=14) | 315 | .259 | .312 | .503 | .815 | 18 | 60 |
ZIPS | 283 | .261 | .329 | .534 | .863 | 20 | 62 |
Chone | 323 | .257 | .322 | .498 | .820 | 20 | 52 |
Marcel | 346 | .249 | .311 | .480 | .791 | 20 | 59 |
BJHB | 345 | .267 | .329 | .545 | .874 | 25 | 66 |
MINER | 302 | .245 | .304 | .474 | .778 | 18 | 51 |
There seems to be a pattern here where the fans are more optimistic about the star players and less optimistic about the lesser players. Thames is no exception as some of the systems like him quite a bit more than the fans do. I think the fans have it about right here though.
Great stuff, as usual!
ReplyDelete