In order to gain a better understanding of how to rank the all-time best Tigers, I've been looking at some statistics which help to compare players from different eras or otherwise different environments. Today, I'll present data on support neutral wins (SNW) and losses (SNL). SNW is the projected number of wins given league average offensive support and SNL is defined similarly.
Table 1 below lists the top 20 Tigers in SNW between 1901-2006. Most of you have probably heard that Hooks Dauss is the all-time Tigers wins leader with 222. However, the SNW leader is Hal Newhouser with 219. Newhouser had 19 fewer actual wins than SNW which probably means that he received less than average run support in the games that he pitched. Dauss, on the other hand, had 16 more actual wins than SNW which probably indicates he received better than league average support.
One might argue that Dauss "pitched to the score" of the game better than Newhouser but that's difficult to prove. I'm sure that supporters of Newhouser would vehemently deny that he did not "know how to win". At any rate, it's important to consider run support when looking at pitcher wins.
Like actual pitcher wins, the SNW statistic is driven by longevity more than excellence. A fairer measure of performance for pitchers with shorter careers is support neutral winning percentage (SNPCT). The all-time top 20 Tigers with a minimum of 1,000 innings pitched are listed in Table 2 below. John Hiller is the number one pitcher with a SNPCT of .644 but he was mostly a reliever. The best SNPCT for a starter was Newhouser at .629. He was followed by Tommy Bridges (.608) and Dizzy Trout (.605).
Is it better to judge pitchers by longevity or excellence? Pitchers like Newhouser and Bridges who rank well by either criteria are pretty easy to evaluate. Those pitchers should make our Tigers Hall of Fame with little debate. Where things get interesting is when we compare a pitcher like Wild Bill Donovan (130 SNW and .549 SNPCT in 2,137 innings) to Harry Coveleski (69 and .598 in 1,023 innings). Coveleski pitched better when he did pitch but Donovan pitched twice as much. Which one is more deserving of the Tigers Hall of Fame? Most of us agree that both longevity and excellence are important but some place more emphasis on the latter and some on the former. It's an issue which is at the center of many debates as our voting process goes on. Next time, I'll discuss the statistic runs saved above average which tries to combine longevity and excellence
The data for this analysis were extracted from the Lee Sinnis Complete Baseball Encyclopedia.
Table 1: Tigers All-time Support Neutral Wins Leaders
Pitcher | W | SNW |
Hal Newhouser | 200 | 219 |
Hooks Dauss | 222 | 206 |
Tommy Bridges | 194 | 202 |
Mickey Lolich | 207 | 200 |
George Mullin | 208 | 200 |
Dizzy Trout | 161 | 190 |
Jack Morris | 198 | 188 |
Frank Lary | 123 | 132 |
Earl Whitehill | 133 | 131 |
Wild Bill Donovan | 141 | 130 |
Virgil Trucks | 114 | 119 |
Jim Bunning | 118 | 116 |
Dan Petry | 119 | 113 |
John Hiller | 87 | 105 |
Vic Sorrell | 92 | 100 |
Denny McLain | 117 | 99 |
Ed Killian | 99 | 96 |
Fred Hutchinson | 95 | 94 |
Schoolboy Rowe | 105 | 92 |
Table 2: All-Time Tigers Support Neutral Percentage Leaders
Pitcher | IP | SNW | SNL | SNPCT |
John Hiller | 1242 | 105 | 58 | .644 |
Hal Newhouser | 2944 | 219 | 129 | .629 |
Tommy Bridges | 2826 | 202 | 130 | .608 |
Dizzy Trout | 2592 | 190 | 124 | .605 |
Harry Coveleski | 1023 | 67 | 45 | .598 |
Ed Siever | 1036 | 68 | 46 | .596 |
Al Benton | 1219 | 80 | 55 | .593 |
Dave Rozema | 1007 | 61 | 42 | .592 |
Hank Aguirre | 1180 | 74 | 54 | .578 |
Virgil Trucks | 1802 | 119 | 91 | .567 |
Frank Lary | 2008 | 132 | 101 | .567 |
Fred Hutchinson | 1465 | 94 | 72 | .566 |
Jim Bunning | 1867 | 116 | 89 | .566 |
Ed Killian | 1536 | 96 | 77 | .555 |
Denny McLain | 1592 | 99 | 80 | .553 |
Schoolboy Rowe | 1444 | 92 | 75 | .551 |
Wild Bill Donovan | 2137 | 130 | 107 | .549 |
Jack Morris | 3042 | 188 | 160 | .540 |
Elden Auker | 1084 | 69 | 60 | .535 |
No comments:
Post a Comment