PCT=(RS squared)/(RS squared + RA squared)
The formula works reasonably well in most years for most teams. This indicates that winning games is essentially a function of how many runs a team scores and allows and when the runs were scored is not so important in most cases.
For example, the 2008 Tigers scored 821 runs and allowed 857. Plugging those numbers into the above formula yields a winning percentage of .479 which translates into 78 predicted wins. In reality, they won 74 games so they underperformed their pythagorean estimate by four wins.
When a team under performs like the Tigers did, it usually means they either they did poorly in close games or they won a disproportionate number of blowouts. In this case, both were true. They were 16-25 in one run games and 4-0 in games decided by 13 runs or more.
The results for all American and National League teams are presented in tables 1 and 2 below. All American League teams but two finished within five runs of their Pythagorean estimate. Thanks to an outstanding record of 61-28 in games decided by one or two runs, the Angels out did their estimate by 11 wins. The Blue Jays, on the other hand, fell eight wins below their predicted wins. This is because they were 9-1 in games decided by eight or more runs and 16-25 in one run games.
There were also only two National League teams that fell more than five wins outside their Pythagorean estimate. The Braves under performed by 6 wins partly because of their 11-30 record in one run games. The Astros over performed by 9 wins thanks, in part, to a 2-9 record in games decided by eight or more runs.
Because performance in close games and blow outs are not consistent from year to year, there is good chance that the Braves and Blue Jays will win more games next year. Conversely, the Angels and Astros might have a difficult time matching their 2008 win totals next year.
Table 1: Pythagorean estimates for American League teams in 2008
runs | runs allowed | actual wins | pred wins | difference | % difference | |
LAA | 765 | 697 | 100 | 89 | 11 | 12.4 |
TB | 774 | 671 | 97 | 92 | 5 | 5.4 |
KC | 691 | 781 | 75 | 71 | 4 | 5.6 |
TEX | 901 | 967 | 79 | 75 | 4 | 5.3 |
NYA | 789 | 727 | 89 | 88 | 1 | 1.1 |
OAK | 646 | 690 | 75 | 75 | 0 | 0.0 |
CHA | 811 | 729 | 89 | 90 | -1 | -1.1 |
BOS | 845 | 694 | 95 | 97 | -2 | -2.1 |
MIN | 829 | 745 | 88 | 90 | -2 | -2.2 |
BAL | 782 | 869 | 68 | 72 | -4 | -5.6 |
DET | 821 | 857 | 74 | 78 | -4 | -5.1 |
CLE | 805 | 761 | 81 | 86 | -5 | -5.8 |
SEA | 671 | 811 | 61 | 66 | -5 | -7.6 |
TOR | 714 | 610 | 86 | 94 | -8 | -8.5 |
Table 2: Pythagorean estimates for National League teams in 2008
team | runs | runs allowed | actual wins | pred wins | difference | % difference |
HOU | 712 | 743 | 86 | 77 | 9 | 11.7 |
SF | 640 | 759 | 72 | 67 | 5 | 7.5 |
CIN | 704 | 800 | 74 | 71 | 3 | 4.2 |
FLA | 770 | 767 | 84 | 81 | 3 | 3.7 |
MIL | 750 | 689 | 90 | 88 | 2 | 2.3 |
COL | 747 | 822 | 74 | 73 | 1 | 1.4 |
PIT | 735 | 884 | 67 | 66 | 1 | 1.5 |
ARI | 720 | 706 | 82 | 83 | -1 | -1.2 |
NYN | 799 | 715 | 89 | 90 | -1 | -1.1 |
STL | 779 | 725 | 86 | 87 | -1 | -1.1 |
PHI | 799 | 680 | 92 | 94 | -2 | -2.1 |
WAS | 641 | 825 | 59 | 61 | -2 | -3.3 |
CHN | 855 | 671 | 97 | 100 | -3 | -3.0 |
LAN | 700 | 648 | 84 | 87 | -3 | -3.4 |
SD | 637 | 764 | 63 | 66 | -3 | -4.5 |
ATL | 753 | 778 | 72 | 78 | -6 | -7.7 |
No comments:
Post a Comment