You will notice that the number of runs allowed by each American League team was within 5 percent of their defensive runs created. So, the agreement between runs allowed and defense runs created was even stronger than it was for offense. In the National League, there were three teams that fell outside the 5% range.
Table 1 shows that the Tigers defense allowed 857 runs which is just six more than the 851 runs they theoretically created in 2008. So, their pitching was neither lucky nor unlucky. It was just bad. Both their pitching and hitting were sabermetrically correct.
The team that was best (luckiest?) at preventing hits and walks from becoming runs was you guessed it - the Twins. They allowed 27 fewer runs than their pitchers and fielders theoretically created. The most unlucky American League team was the Rangers who allowed 4.4% more than they created.
There were three National League teams who allowed at least 5% fewer runs than they should have - the Phillies (8.0%), Cardinals (7%) and Reds (5.1%). The unluckiest team was the Diamondbacks who allowed 3.5% more than they created.
Table 1: Runs Allowed Versus Defense Runs Created in American League in 2008
Runs allowed | Runs Created | difference | % difference | |
MIN | 745 | 772 | -27 | -3.5 |
LAA | 697 | 721 | -24 | -3.4 |
TOR | 610 | 630 | -20 | -3.2 |
SEA | 811 | 837 | -26 | -3.1 |
BAL | 869 | 882 | -13 | -1.5 |
TB | 671 | 679 | -8 | -1.2 |
CHA | 729 | 734 | -5 | -0.7 |
CLE | 761 | 765 | -4 | -0.5 |
NYA | 727 | 723 | 4 | 0.5 |
BOS | 694 | 690 | 4 | 0.5 |
DET | 857 | 851 | 6 | 0.7 |
OAK | 690 | 684 | 6 | 0.9 |
KC | 781 | 753 | 28 | 3.8 |
TEX | 967 | 926 | 41 | 4.4 |
Table 1: Runs Allowed Versus Defense Runs Created in National League in 2008
Team | Runs allowed | Runs Created | difference | % difference |
PHI | 680 | 739 | -59 | -8.0 |
STL | 725 | 780 | -55 | -7.0 |
CIN | 800 | 843 | -43 | -5.1 |
HOU | 743 | 766 | -23 | -3.0 |
PIT | 884 | 911 | -27 | -3.0 |
MIL | 689 | 709 | -20 | -2.8 |
NYN | 715 | 729 | -14 | -2.0 |
CHN | 671 | 679 | -8 | -1.2 |
SF | 759 | 756 | 3 | 0.3 |
LAN | 648 | 645 | 3 | 0.4 |
SD | 764 | 758 | 6 | 0.7 |
COL | 822 | 816 | 6 | 0.8 |
WAS | 825 | 814 | 11 | 1.3 |
ATL | 778 | 761 | 17 | 2.3 |
FLA | 767 | 745 | 22 | 3.0 |
ARI | 706 | 682 | 24 | 3.5 |
This is an interesting chart of data that conforms to some of my own private stats. I have concluded from my own calculations that the Tigers' pitchers performed reasonably well in relation to the high number of runs they gave up. In other words, my findings show that the Tigers got a little more "unlucky" than their fair share given how the pitchers performed. And they happened to have some "unlucky" batting performances in the wrong spots as well, resulting in the overall rough season.
ReplyDelete---TSE
Based on the stats, Robertson, Verlander and Rogers pitched better than their ERAs. Galarraga, on the other hand, pitched worse than his ERA. I'll be getting more into that later.
ReplyDeleteLee