Today, I’ll return to the batted balls versus pitchers theme of last winter. To review, an at bat can result in any of the following events:
- Strikeout
- Base on balls
- Hits batsman
- Ground ball
- Line drive
- Outfield fly
- Infield fly
Three of those events are generally favorable events for pitchers:
- Strikeout (SO)
- Ground ball (GB)
- Infield fly (IFF)
I will call these run preventing events (RPE). Of course, a ground ball is not as easy an out as a strikeout or an infield fly and can have a negative result for a pitcher. However, inducing a lot of ground balls will help to prevent runs over the course of a season. On the other hand, it is good for pitchers to avoid, for the most part, the following events:
- Base on balls
- Hits batsman
- Line drive
- Outfield fly
Last year, I constructed a stat called Run Preventing Event Percentage (RPE%) = (SO + GB + IFF)/BFP where where BFP = Batters Faced by Pitcher. Striking out batters and inducing grounders have been shown to be repeatable skills. Getting batters to hit infield flies is not stable from year to year (correlation = .10 between 2005 and 2006). However, infield flies are relatively rare compared to other batted ball types and including them does not change the RPE% substantially in most cases. Plus, I suspect (without statistical evidence) that this is a real ability for some power pitchers.
It turns out that RPE% is fairly stable with a .66 correlation between 2005 and 2006. It can also be considered a fielding independent stat because, although the end result is not independent of fielders, getting a grounder or infield fly to happen in the first place has nothing to do with fielders. It is as stable or more stable than FIP but it is not weighted and thus does not explain as much about runs allowed. RPE% is just an exploratory stat for now.
There are 47 American League starters with 60 or more innings pitched so far. Table 1 lists the RPE% rankings for Tigers starters. Table 2 lists the top 20 pitchers in the league. The raw dataused for the calculations were extracted from The Hardball Times database. We can see that Jeremy Bonderman (RPE%=58.5) ranks very well (7th in the
Table 1: Run Preventing Events for Tigers Starters through June 9, 2007
Rank | Pitcher | BFP | K | GB | IFB | RPE | RPE% |
7 | Bonderman | 299 | 64 | 103 | 9 | 176 | 58.8 |
24 | Verlander | 319 | 56 | 102 | 12 | 170 | 53.3 |
25 | Robertson | 296 | 34 | 119 | 5 | 158 | 53.2 |
30 | Durbin | 296 | 36 | 109 | 10 | 155 | 52.4 |
45 | Maroth | 294 | 22 | 98 | 9 | 129 | 44.0 |
Table 2: Run Preventing Events for Top 20 AL Starters through June 9, 2007
Pitcher | Tm | BFP | K | GB | IFB | RPE | RPE% |
Carmona | CLE | 307 | 33 | 163 | 2 | 198 | 64.6 |
Beckett | BOS | 285 | 67 | 104 | 11 | 182 | 63.7 |
Wang | NYA | 256 | 29 | 127 | 5 | 161 | 62.8 |
Burnett | TOR | 360 | 96 | 117 | 8 | 221 | 61.3 |
Halladay | TOR | 280 | 46 | 121 | 4 | 171 | 60.9 |
Meche | KC | 378 | 68 | 148 | 12 | 228 | 60.3 |
Bonderman | DET | 299 | 64 | 103 | 9 | 176 | 58.8 |
Bedard | BAL | 343 | 95 | 101 | 5 | 201 | 58.7 |
Gaudin | OAK | 328 | 51 | 127 | 9 | 187 | 57.1 |
Cabrera | BAL | 366 | 68 | 130 | 11 | 209 | 57.0 |
Escobar | LAA | 298 | 52 | 105 | 12 | 169 | 56.9 |
Sabathia | CLE | 365 | 83 | 114 | 9 | 207 | 56.6 |
Blanton | OAK | 366 | 63 | 130 | 12 | 206 | 56.2 |
Pettitte | NYA | 349 | 46 | 140 | 9 | 195 | 56.0 |
Shields | TB | 387 | 83 | 117 | 15 | 216 | 55.8 |
Guthrie | BAL | 255 | 42 | 95 | 4 | 141 | 55.3 |
Buehrle | CHA | 279 | 48 | 97 | 8 | 153 | 54.8 |
Loe | | 283 | 35 | 118 | 2 | 155 | 54.8 |
Santana | MIN | 344 | 96 | 79 | 11 | 187 | 54.3 |
Haren | OAK | 374 | 76 | 108 | 17 | 201 | 53.7 |
The fact that Carmona tops this list, despite only striking out 33 batters, is astounding. Is there reason (I hope) to think the groundball rate will regress toward the mean?
ReplyDeleteFrom what I gather, he is supposed to have one of the best sinkers in the game so he may be able to keep it up. The data is limited but he had a GB rate close to 60% last year as well. Of course, this kind of pitcher needs a good infield defense behind him. The good news for us is that the Indians don't have that so he might start giving up a ton of hits like he did last year.
ReplyDeleteLee,
ReplyDeleteWhat do you make of Verlander's RPE and FIP numbers?
These stats seem to indicate that Verlander is the luckiest pitcher in baseball...
A rookie season of 17-9 with a 3.63 ERA may have been a stroke of luck, but a sophomore season of 9-2 with a 2.78 ERA, and a no-hitter, has to be proof that Verlander is doing something that these stats are missing.
Erik, Verlander has a very good LOB% meaning he strands a lot of runners. That is the main reason he is able to keep his ERA down. That is not generally a skill but it can be for some. Still, you won't find any pitchers with a lot of success year after year just based on LOB%.
ReplyDeleteHe'll need to improve his peripherals - k rate, BB rate, GB rate - if he is going to be successful every year. I believe he will. In fact, it's already happening. I haven't re-calculated his RPE but his FIP has improved a lot in his last three starts.