<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17907776.post4430814280898405572..comments</id><updated>2008-10-09T14:41:56.982-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Comments on Tiger Tales: A Detroit Tigers Blog: Tigers team statistical summary for 2008</title><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.detroittigertales.com/feeds/4430814280898405572/comments/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/17907776/4430814280898405572/comments/default'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.detroittigertales.com/2008/10/tigers-team-statistical-summary-for.html'/><author><name>Lee Panas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/17148118898954670307</uri><email>tiger337@comcast.net</email></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>4</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17907776.post-9065452467320196574</id><published>2008-10-09T14:41:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2008-10-09T14:41:00.000-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Interesting.In other words the Tigers could have w...</title><summary type='text'>Interesting.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;In other words the Tigers could have won the division if they had fielded and hit as well as last year despite AWFUL PITCHING!&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;That is not how I perceived the season and strangely it gives me optimism about next year because there are lots of ways to fix the team.</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/17907776/4430814280898405572/comments/default/9065452467320196574'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/17907776/4430814280898405572/comments/default/9065452467320196574'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.detroittigertales.com/2008/10/tigers-team-statistical-summary-for.html?showComment=1223577660000#c9065452467320196574' title=''/><author><name>jaymo</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://www.detroittigertales.com/2008/10/tigers-team-statistical-summary-for.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17907776.post-4430814280898405572' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/17907776/posts/default/4430814280898405572' type='text/html'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17907776.post-7414634671653286176</id><published>2008-10-09T12:37:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2008-10-09T12:37:00.000-04:00</updated><title type='text'>This is a great question and you were on the right...</title><summary type='text'>This is a great question and you were on the right track. A play made is considered to be .8 runs saved. The simplest explanation I could find is by Tom Tango:&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;http://www.insidethebook.com/ee/index.php/site/article/why_saving_a_play_is_worth_08_runs/&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Last year, the Tigers were at +45 so their defense saved 36 runs more than the average team. This year they were -54 so that's 43 </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/17907776/4430814280898405572/comments/default/7414634671653286176'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/17907776/4430814280898405572/comments/default/7414634671653286176'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.detroittigertales.com/2008/10/tigers-team-statistical-summary-for.html?showComment=1223570220000#c7414634671653286176' title=''/><author><name>Lee Panas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/17148118898954670307</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='00952546381302504354'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://www.detroittigertales.com/2008/10/tigers-team-statistical-summary-for.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17907776.post-4430814280898405572' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/17907776/posts/default/4430814280898405572' type='text/html'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17907776.post-7741607580201404699</id><published>2008-10-09T12:11:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2008-10-09T12:11:00.000-04:00</updated><title type='text'>I probably should have done this before my first p...</title><summary type='text'>I probably should have done this before my first post to avoid too many comments, but the naive approach at least appears feasible.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Using the simplest form of Pythagoread wins the Tigers lost 6 wins because they scored fewer runs this year.  If you call the difference between the Pythagorean wins and actual wins luck then the Tigers lost 2 wins because they were more unlucky this year </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/17907776/4430814280898405572/comments/default/7741607580201404699'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/17907776/4430814280898405572/comments/default/7741607580201404699'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.detroittigertales.com/2008/10/tigers-team-statistical-summary-for.html?showComment=1223568660000#c7741607580201404699' title=''/><author><name>Jaymo</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://www.detroittigertales.com/2008/10/tigers-team-statistical-summary-for.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17907776.post-4430814280898405572' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/17907776/posts/default/4430814280898405572' type='text/html'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17907776.post-8702106847064513101</id><published>2008-10-09T11:44:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2008-10-09T11:44:00.000-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Thanks for the link to THT.  Those guys have a kna...</title><summary type='text'>Thanks for the link to THT.  Those guys have a knack for making stats explainable.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Now I know going through multiple estimations we might lose some correlation, but has anyone taken the difference in +/- and tried to correlate it with runs?&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Naively I suppose you might assume all unfielded balls were all singles and see how that might alter OBP and SLG against your pitchers and </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/17907776/4430814280898405572/comments/default/8702106847064513101'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/17907776/4430814280898405572/comments/default/8702106847064513101'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.detroittigertales.com/2008/10/tigers-team-statistical-summary-for.html?showComment=1223567040000#c8702106847064513101' title=''/><author><name>Jaymo</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://www.detroittigertales.com/2008/10/tigers-team-statistical-summary-for.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17907776.post-4430814280898405572' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/17907776/posts/default/4430814280898405572' type='text/html'/></entry></feed>